Arka 360 vs PVcase
Which tool is better for your solar installation business? Compare pricing, features, and verified reviews side-by-side.
Arka 360 is the Gold Standard for Stage 2 installers who prioritize ai-powered 3d site reconstruction.
PVcase is the superior choice for Stage 4 teams needing autocad integration.
How this impacts your Design margin
Moving between Arka 360 and PVcase requires a recalibration of shading accuracy tolerances and proposal design standards.
Arka 360
Key Features
- AI-powered 3D site reconstruction
- Instant solar proposal generation
- Automated shading and production analysis
- Integrated permitting and CAD services
- Mobile-friendly field mapping tools
Pros
- Extremely fast learning curve for sales reps
- Visuals represent high-quality professional rendering
- Strong balance between design accuracy and sales speed
Cons
- LIDAR coverage depends on local imagery availability
- Less known than Aurora, potentially smaller database
- Advanced engineering features still maturing
PVcase
Key Features
- AutoCAD integration
- Automated terrain-based layout
- Collision detection
- Export to PVsyst
Pros
- Industry leader for utility-scale
- Saves hundreds of engineering hours
- Massive ROI for large projects
Cons
- Requires AutoCAD license
- High upfront cost
- Not suitable for residential
The Verdict: Who Wins?
Choose Arka 360 if...
You prioritize Extremely fast learning curve for sales reps and fast-growing residential teams needing rapid ai site surveys. Arka 360 is best for teams looking for a robust, well-established platform.
Choose PVcase if...
You prioritize Industry leader for utility-scale and utility-scale layout and topography engineering. PVcase offers a specialized approach tailored for high-performance solar teams.
Still can't decide?
Our Matchmaker Quiz picks the right tool for your specific install volume and business stage.
Take the Matchmaker Quiz ⚡