Arka 360 vs Scanifly
Which tool is better for your solar installation business? Compare pricing, features, and verified reviews side-by-side.
Arka 360 is the Gold Standard for Stage 2 installers who prioritize ai-powered 3d site reconstruction.
Scanifly is the superior choice for Stage 1-2 teams needing drone photogrammetry.
How this impacts your Design margin
Moving between Arka 360 and Scanifly requires a recalibration of shading accuracy tolerances and proposal design standards.
Arka 360
Key Features
- AI-powered 3D site reconstruction
- Instant solar proposal generation
- Automated shading and production analysis
- Integrated permitting and CAD services
- Mobile-friendly field mapping tools
Pros
- Extremely fast learning curve for sales reps
- Visuals represent high-quality professional rendering
- Strong balance between design accuracy and sales speed
Cons
- LIDAR coverage depends on local imagery availability
- Less known than Aurora, potentially smaller database
- Advanced engineering features still maturing
Scanifly
Key Features
- Drone photogrammetry
- Bankable shading analysis
- Virtual site assessments
- Automatic layout generation
Pros
- Eliminates roof climbing
- Highly precise models
- Increases safety for surveyors
Cons
- Requires FAA certification for drones
- Initial hardware investment
- Cloud syncing can take time
The Verdict: Who Wins?
Choose Arka 360 if...
You prioritize Extremely fast learning curve for sales reps and fast-growing residential teams needing rapid ai site surveys. Arka 360 is best for teams looking for a robust, well-established platform.
Choose Scanifly if...
You prioritize Eliminates roof climbing and speeding up site surveys. Scanifly offers a specialized approach tailored for high-performance solar teams.
Still can't decide?
Our Matchmaker Quiz picks the right tool for your specific install volume and business stage.
Take the Matchmaker Quiz ⚡