Pylon vs Scanifly
Which tool is better for your solar installation business? Compare pricing, features, and verified reviews side-by-side.
Pylon is the Gold Standard for Stage 1-2 installers who prioritize high-resolution aerial imagery.
Scanifly is the superior choice for Stage 1-2 teams needing drone photogrammetry.
How this impacts your Design margin
Moving between Pylon and Scanifly requires a recalibration of shading accuracy tolerances and proposal design standards.
Pylon
Key Features
- High-resolution aerial imagery
- 3D shading analysis
- Integrated CRM and lead management
- E-signature and contract generation
- No monthly subscription fees
- Mobile-friendly field design
Pros
- Zero monthly platform fees
- Extremely high-quality roof site imagery
- Speed of design is best-in-class for resi
Cons
- Limited commercial modeling depth
- Fewer third-party API integrations than Aurora
- Per-project costs can add up at high volume
Scanifly
Key Features
- Drone photogrammetry
- Bankable shading analysis
- Virtual site assessments
- Automatic layout generation
Pros
- Eliminates roof climbing
- Highly precise models
- Increases safety for surveyors
Cons
- Requires FAA certification for drones
- Initial hardware investment
- Cloud syncing can take time
The Verdict: Who Wins?
Choose Pylon if...
You prioritize Zero monthly platform fees and fast, high-resolution residential design and proposals. Pylon is best for teams looking for a robust, well-established platform.
Choose Scanifly if...
You prioritize Eliminates roof climbing and speeding up site surveys. Scanifly offers a specialized approach tailored for high-performance solar teams.
Still can't decide?
Our Matchmaker Quiz picks the right tool for your specific install volume and business stage.
Take the Matchmaker Quiz ⚡