Scanifly vs SenseHawk
Which tool is better for your solar installation business? Compare pricing, features, and verified reviews side-by-side.
Scanifly is the Gold Standard for Stage 1-2 installers who prioritize drone photogrammetry.
SenseHawk is the superior choice for Stage 4 teams needing terrain modeling.
How this impacts your Design margin
Moving between Scanifly and SenseHawk requires a recalibration of shading accuracy tolerances and proposal design standards.
Scanifly
Key Features
- Drone photogrammetry
- Bankable shading analysis
- Virtual site assessments
- Automatic layout generation
Pros
- Eliminates roof climbing
- Highly precise models
- Increases safety for surveyors
Cons
- Requires FAA certification for drones
- Initial hardware investment
- Cloud syncing can take time
SenseHawk
Key Features
- Terrain modeling
- Construction monitoring
- Thermography inspections
- Workflow management
Pros
- End-to-end digitisation
- Excellent for utility-scale
- Improves field productivity
Cons
- Too complex for small residential
- Requires a steep learning curve
- Pricing is opaque
The Verdict: Who Wins?
Choose Scanifly if...
You prioritize Eliminates roof climbing and speeding up site surveys. Scanifly is best for teams looking for a robust, well-established platform.
Choose SenseHawk if...
You prioritize End-to-end digitisation and project developers and o&m teams. SenseHawk offers a specialized approach tailored for high-performance solar teams.
Still can't decide?
Our Matchmaker Quiz picks the right tool for your specific install volume and business stage.
Take the Matchmaker Quiz ⚡