Mosaic vs SolarKal
Which tool is better for your solar installation business? Compare pricing, features, and verified reviews side-by-side.
Mosaic is the Gold Standard for Stage 2 installers who prioritize deep api integrations with design tools.
SolarKal is the superior choice for Stage 3 teams needing vendor-neutral rfp bidding.
How this impacts your Finance margin
Switching finance partners usually impacts the homeowner's experience, requiring new loan documentation flows and dealer fee calculations.
Mosaic
Key Features
- Deep API integrations with design tools
- PowerSwitch loan products
- Contract generation
- Soft-credit pull pre-approval
Pros
- Integrates seamlessly with Aurora/Solo
- Highly trusted consumer brand
- Robust backend for massive fleets
Cons
- Can be unforgiving with dealer audits
- APR/Dealer fee balance fluctuates heavily
- Platform can feel sluggish on mobile
SolarKal
Key Features
- Vendor-neutral RFP bidding
- Project financial comparison tool
- Procurement dashboard
- Advisor communications
Pros
- Drives down costs for property owners
- Highly transparent process
- Includes expert advisory tools
Cons
- Limits direct installer margins
- Mostly useful only in specific US states
- Focuses more on the client side
The Verdict: Who Wins?
Choose Mosaic if...
You prioritize Integrates seamlessly with Aurora/Solo and scaling residential solar lending. Mosaic is best for teams looking for a robust, well-established platform.
Choose SolarKal if...
You prioritize Drives down costs for property owners and commercial property owners. SolarKal offers a specialized approach tailored for high-performance solar teams.
Still can't decide?
Our Matchmaker Quiz picks the right tool for your specific install volume and business stage.
Take the Matchmaker Quiz ⚡